Journal Title: National Journal for Legal Research and Innovative Ideas
ISSN(O):2582-8665
Frequency : Quarterly
Volume : 6
Issue : 3
Period : April- June 2026
1. AI and Telecom Surveillance: National Security vs Privacy Debate — A Critical Analysis
By-Shishir Kant Singh, LLM Candidate, Amity University, Noida
•Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into telecommunication surveillance has fundamentally transformed the mechanisms through which states ensure national security. AI-driven systems enable real-time monitoring, predictive analysis, and mass data processing, allowing governments to detect and respond to potential threats with unprecedented efficiency. However, these technological advancements have simultaneously intensified concerns regarding privacy, civil liberties, and the potential misuse of surveillance powers. This paper critically examines the intersection of AI-based telecom surveillance and the constitutional right to privacy in India. It analyses the evolving legal framework, including the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, highlighting their limitations in addressing modern surveillance challenges. Special emphasis is placed on the landmark judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017), which recognized privacy as a fundamental right and established the proportionality test as a standard for evaluating state action.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
2. Cybersecurity Regulation of Telecommunication Infrastructure in India
•Abstract
By- Priyanshu Parmar, LLM Candidate, Amity University, Noida
The rapid expansion of India’s telecommunications infrastructure has played a transformative role in advancing the country’s digital economy and enabling widespread connectivity. With increasing dependence on telecom networks for communication, governance, financial transactions, and delivery of digital services, the sector has emerged as a critical component of national infrastructure. However, this accelerated growth has also heightened exposure to a wide spectrum of cybersecurity threats, including data breaches, network intrusions, denial-of-service attacks, and even cyber warfare. Such vulnerabilities pose significant risks not only to individual users but also to economic stability and national security, thereby necessitating a comprehensive and robust regulatory framework. This paper critically examines the cybersecurity regulatory regime governing telecommunication infrastructure in India. It analyses the existing legal framework, including statutory provisions and policy measures, alongside the roles played by key institutional bodies in ensuring network security and resilience. The study further explores emerging challenges arising from technological advancements, particularly the deployment of 5G networks, increasing concerns around data protection, and vulnerabilities associated with global supply chains in telecom equipment.bIn addition, the paper adopts a comparative perspective by briefly evaluating international practices and regulatory models to identify best practices that may be adapted within the Indian context. It assesses the effectiveness and limitations of the current Indian approach in addressing evolving cybersecurity threats in the telecom sector. The paper concludes by proposing targeted recommendations aimed at strengthening cybersecurity governance, enhancing regulatory coordination, and promoting a secure and sustainable digital ecosystem in India.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
3. Mandatory Open Offer under SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 2011: A Safeguard for Minority Shareholders in India
By- Nikhilesh Pratap Singh Gour, UG Law Student, Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University
•Abstract
The Mandatory Open Offer, which is instituted by the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 ("SAST 2011") , is the primary tool of ensuring that minority shareholders are not left behind in the hands of an unknown management after a change of control in the corporation. This paper discusses the three pillars of the framework that interlock with each other (Regulations 3, 4 and 5), the pricing protection (Regulation 8), and the operational and judicial architecture, and analyzes their overall efficiency as a true Exit Opportunity. The paper, by analysing the doctrines of landmark cases such as the Subhkam Ventures v SEBI case, the ArcelorMittal India v Satish Kumar Gupta case, the Xchanging Solutions Ltd case and the Jet-Etihad scandal, and a comparative analysis of the UK City Code and the US Williams Act, finds three structural gaps: the undefined nature of control, leakage of premiums through composite It is followed by four specific legislative recommendations that would transform the Mandatory Open Offer into a strong substantive right and a procedural right of a high quality.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
4. Copyright in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Streaming: Challenges of Authorship, Ownership, and Enforcement
By- Dhruv S. Amin, Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat
•Abstract
The fusion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Over-The-Top (OTT) streaming services has challenged traditional copyright doctrines. This paper explores the two-fold challenge presented by AI-generated works and the rise of Over-The-Top (OTT) streaming platforms to the existing legal framework, focusing primarily on India's Copyright Act, 1957 and overseas developments from the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom. This paper draws on recent case law - Thaler v. Perlmutter (2023), Getty Images v. Stability AI (2025), and Andersen v. Stability AI (2023) - and legislative responses - the EU AI Act (2024) and India's IT Rules (2021) - to pinpoint four critical doctrinal shortfalls: uncertainty regarding authorship criteria for AI-generated works; the inefficiency of the existing OTT licensing framework; the ineffectiveness of enforcement strategies for large-scale digital infringements; and the absence of international harmonisation. The paper outlines a coherent set of reforms focusing on a sui generis right for AI-generated works, a qualified text-and-data-mining (TDM) exception with mandatory remuneration of creators, legislative recognition of dynamic injunctions and active participation by India in WIPO's discussions on AI copyright.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
5.Legal Challenges in Implementing the PPV&FR Act, 2001: A Comparative Perspective with Global Plant Variety Protection Laws
By- Udit J. Kapadiya, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), Unitedworld School of Law, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat
•Abstract
The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Act, 2001 (PPV&FR Act) is an Indian sui generis reaction to the requirements of Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS Agreement, and is the only law in the world to combine rights of breeders, rights of farmers, community rights, and benefit-sharing practices into one statutory document. The paper takes a critical look at the legal and institutional issues that have cropped up during the operation of the Act over the last 25 years such as registration bottlenecks, doctrinal ambiguity in identifying essentially derived varieties (EDVs), weaknesses in DUS testing infrastructure, and poor performance of benefit-sharing provisions. The paper puts the context of the UPOV 1978 and 1991 Conventions, the TRIPS framework, and the plant variety protection systems of some jurisdictions, such as China, Kenya, the United States, the European Union and Australia, to discover the reform pathways in India. Cases in the judiciary and the administrative arena, especially the Monsanto-Nuziveedu patent case, the CCI cases with Mahyco Monsanto Biotech, the Sungro Seeds patent infringement case, and the PepsiCo FL-2027 potato scandal are examined in order to trace incomplete doctrinal tensions. The paper concludes that, although the statutory model used in India is one of the farmer-oriented models in the world, its potential has not been realised because of the loopholes in its implementation and suggests specific legal and policy amendments to address this gap.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
6. Effectiveness of GST System in Reducing Tax Evasion: A Taxpayer Perspective
By- Danish Raza, LLM Candidate, Amity University, Noida
•Abstract
The enactment of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) through the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 was a milestone in India’s indirect taxation system. The main objective of implementing GST is to simplify the taxation process, eliminate inefficiencies, and improve efficiency. This paper provides an analysis of the effectiveness of the GST in reducing tax evasion, considering the perspective of a taxpayer in India. The study considers both the theoretical and practical aspects of GST in relation to tax compliance. The discussion starts with an understanding of the concepts related to tax compliance, mainly deterrence theory and voluntary compliance theory. These theories will be used to assess the efficacy of the GST in incorporating legal compulsion and simplicity. Some of the key components of GST, including Input Tax Credit (ITC), e-invoicing, e-way bills, and digital technology enabled through the Goods and Services Tax Network, will be evaluated to examine whether the GST can establish a self-enforcing mechanism for tax compliance. Additionally, the implications of GST on the formalization of the economy and the broadening of the tax base will be considered.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
7. SEXUAL OFFENCES AND HARASSMENT AGAINST WOMEN IN INDIA
By- Priyanshu, LLM Candidate, Amity University, Noida
•Abstract
Rape is a crime that inflicts severe and long-lasting trauma on its survivors, often described as the "beginning of a nightmare." The aftermath can include depression, fear, feelings of guilt, suicidal thoughts, and a diminished interest in sexual activity. As one survivor notes, it creates a fear of "half the human race." Addressing the unfortunate reality of women's status in society, Mr. Justice S. Ahmad remarked that women in India are often placed at a disadvantage due to various social barriers, making them vulnerable to oppression by men. Despite being constitutionally guaranteed equal status, women continue to suffer from systemic injustices. Justice Ahmad emphasized that women have the right to life, liberty, respect, and equal treatment as citizens. Their honor and dignity must be upheld, and they are entitled to live with peace and honor, free from violation.”.Rape is a crime against basic human rights and is also violative of the victim’s most cherished of the fundamental rights, normally, the right to life contained in Article 21.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
8. The Right to Die with Dignity: An Analysis of Passive Euthanasia in India Post-Harish Rana and a Comparative Global Perspective
By-Ankur Agnihotri (Advocate, Supreme Court of India) & Shree Agnihotri (3rd year Law Student, Aligarh Muslim University)
•Abstract
This paper examines the landmark 2026 Indian Supreme Court judgment in Harish Rana v. Union of India & Ors., which authorized passive euthanasia for an individual in a Permanent Vegetative State (PVS), transitioning the right from a theoretical principle to a practical reality. It analyzes the evolution of this right within the framework of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The study provides a comparative legal analysis of euthanasia laws in jurisdictions like the Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada, which permit active euthanasia, against India's stance of solely permitting passive euthanasia. Finally, the paper engages with the core ethical debate: whether passive euthanasia is a necessary medical outcome or an essential component of the fundamental right to die with dignity, balancing individual autonomy against societal and ethical safeguards to prevent misuse.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
9. Children’s Right to Health and Medical Laws in the Maldives: A post-COVID-19 analysis
By- Dr. Shahab Shabbir, Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
•Abstract
Being healthy doesn’t mean being free from illness or disease; it also refers to one's physical, mental, and social well-being. Everyone has the right to immediate access to high-quality medical treatment. Children's right to health is especially important because they are vulnerable people who are more prone to illness and health problems. Children who are protected from disease and have access to better health care can develop into healthy adults and so contribute to the creation of vibrant and successful civilisations. The COVID-19 epidemic affected individuals all across the world, and the vulnerable members of society, particularly children of all ages and in every region on the globe, were inexorably affected. But the pandemic's harmful effects were not distributed equally. It turned out to be most damaging for children in the developing and underdeveloped countries. And the Maldives, being a developing nation, was at the forefront of child vulnerability and health risks. Nonetheless, the legal arrangements in the Maldives, as well as international measures and protocols, proved an elixir for addressing children's health risks and rights. A close examination of these medico-legal arrangements suggests that the risk to children's health could be addressed and mitigated during pandemics, and the present paper addresses this.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
10. Can Nature Have Rights? A Constitutional Analysis of the Legal Personality of Rivers in India
By- Shalini, LLM Candidate, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University
•Abstract
This paper examines whether Indian constitutional law can recognise rivers as rights-bearing legal persons, and whether such recognition offers a workable response to the continuing failure of conventional environmental regulation. The question has acquired practical significance following the Uttarakhand High Court's decisions in Mohd. Salim v. State of Uttarakhand and Lalit Miglani v. State of Uttarakhand, where the Ganga and Yamuna rivers, along with connected ecological systems, were declared juristic persons. Those decisions marked a significant doctrinal departure by attempting to move rivers from the category of protected resources to that of legal subjects. The paper evaluates the constitutional basis, institutional feasibility, and doctrinal coherence of that shift. The analysis begins by locating the legal personality of rivers within the broader jurisprudence of legal personality, earth jurisprudence, and environmental constitutionalism. It argues that while Indian law has historically recognised non-human juristic persons, such as idols and trusts, the extension of that principle to rivers requires a stronger constitutional foundation than existing doctrine presently provides. The paper then examines the constitutional and statutory framework governing environmental protection in India, particularly Articles 21, 48A, and 51A(g), and demonstrates that these provisions support environmental protection but do not clearly establish rivers as bearers of rights.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
11. Facilitating Green Technology Collaborations under Indian Competition Law: Lessons from the EU’s Sustainability Approach
By- Kumar Ratnam, LLM Candidate, Amity University, Noida
•Abstract
If these global decarbonization goals are to be met, there needs to be intense collaborationamong competing firms in the development, standardization and diffusion of greentechnologies such as solar photovoltaics, electric vehicle infrastructure, and green hydrogen. Classical competition law however (as designed for traditional market economies and predicated on a fear of horizontal collusion and a focus on static price effects) regards such collaborative activities more readily as presumptively unlawful cartels rather than drivers of dynamic innovation and green public goods. India, interestingly, embodies this structural tension between a necessity of rapid green technology dissemination for the sake of international commitments and domestic policy goals and an absence within the Competition Act, 2002 of a sustainability-conscious test with which to separate the green pro-competitive alliance from the anti-competitive one.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
12. THE EU SINGLE-USE PLASTICS DIRECTIVE, THE BRUSSELS EFFECT, AND GLOBAL PLASTIC GOVERNANCE: TRADE LAW TENSIONS AND REGULATORY COHERENCE
By- Shruti Goel, LL.M. Candidate, Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida
•Abstract
Plastic pollution has emerged as one of the defining environmental crises of the twenty-first century, generating transboundary ecological harm that transcends the capacity of fragmented national and international legal regimes to address. This paper examines two interlocking dimensions of contemporary global plastic governance: the European Union's Single-Use Plastics Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/904) as a paradigmatic life-cycle regulatory instrument, and the Brussels Effect as a mechanism of regulatory globalization through which EU norms diffuse across international markets and legal systems. The paper critically analyses the WTO compatibility of the Directive under the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Agreement and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, drawing on landmark dispute settlement jurisprudence including US–Tuna II, US–Clove Cigarettes, EC–Asbestos, and US–Shrimp. It further interrogates the equity and legitimacy dimensions of the Brussels Effect, particularly its disproportionate compliance burden on developing economies, and situates these concerns within the emerging framework of the Global Plastics Treaty. The paper concludes that while the EU Directive represents a significant advance in life-cycle plastic regulation and its extraterritorial influence has catalysed global norm convergence, durable and equitable plastic governance ultimately requires a legally binding multilateral instrument that integrates trade and environmental objectives with differentiated obligations for developing states.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
13. DIGITAL ESTATES AND POST-MORTEM PRIVACY: A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF LEGISLATIVE GAPS IN THE REGULATION OF DIGITAL ASSET SUCCESSION IN INDIA
By- Simran Naresh, UG Law Student, Amity University Noida
•Abstract
India's digital economy has generated an unprecedented quantum of digital wealth - over fifteen million KYC-verified Virtual Digital Asset holders, a creator economy sustaining two million livelihoods, and digital property of every description. Yet Indian succession law, codified for a world of tangible assets, provides no framework for what happens to this wealth upon death. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, brought into force on 14 November 2025, introduces a nomination mechanism for posthumous data rights but does not constitute a succession framework. This article undertakes a critical evaluation of the legislative gaps, examines the constitutional dimensions of post-mortem privacy under Article 21 and Article 300-A, draws comparative lessons from the United States (RUFADAA), Germany (BGH Facebook 2018), France, Italy, and the EU (GDPR), and proposes the essential architecture of a Digital Estates and Succession Act (DESA) for India.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
14. THE JUDICIAL ENABLING OF THE UNION VETO: A NORMATIVE CRITIQUE OF GUBERNATORIAL INDEFINITENESS AND THE COLLAPSE OF STATE LEGISLATIVE AUTONOMY
By- Ajita Singh, UG Law Student, Amity University Noida
•Abstract
The present study focuses on the constitutional lacuna that arises owing to the absence of timelines in Article 200 of the Constitution of India for Gubernatorial assent. In the modern-day era of 2025–2026, the age-old assumption of ‘Constituent Morality’ and the belief in benevolent leadership have been replaced by an effective Union veto. This research highlights how Governors, appointed by the Centre, have utilized their power of silence to bring State Legislative Assemblies to a standstill, moving India’s federal balance from ‘cooperative’ to ‘coercive.’ The paper argues that the Supreme Court’s shift from an activist position in May 2025 to the ‘dialogic’ Advisory Opinion of November 2025 has legitimized ‘Gubernatorial Indefiniteness.’ Based on comparative models from the UK, Canada, and the US, the study reveals that India stands as a constitutional outlier. The paper recommends amending Article 200 to incorporate a mandatory six-month period and adopting the ‘Doctrine of Deemed Assent’ to restore legislative finality.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
15. THE TRACEABILITY PARADOX: SOCIAL MEDIA SURVEILLANCE VS. THE DPDP ACT
By- Chahak Khare, UG Law Student, Amity University Noida
•Abstract
At every forward of a message on WhatsApp in India, a subtle legal contradiction simmers. On one side sits Rule 4(2) of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, which mandates that a Significant Social Media Intermediary offering messaging services develop an "in-built capability" to trace the "first originator" of any message upon government request. On the other side rests the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, and its subordinate Rules of 2025 is a regime based on the "minimality and purpose limitation" principle. This article contends that these two regimes cannot survive one another without one succumbing to the other. Traceability, by definition, requires a permanent, cross-system tracking apparatus for billions of messages and a pervasive surveillance infrastructure that is structurally at odds with the "minimality and purpose limitation" obligations imposed by Section 8 of the DPDP Act and Rules 3 and 5 of the DPDP Rules, 2025.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
16. JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: SHAPING INDIAN CULTURE THROUGH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION
By- Aarthi Prasanna & Madhu Nisha. J, UG Law Students, Sastra Deemed to Be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu
•Abstract
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a case or petition filed in a court to protect,defend or enforce public interest. Public interest means the interest or right belonging to the public, a particular section or group of people in the community. PIL is filed to resolve issues affecting the legal rights of the community or the general public to protect the collective interest of the society rather than the interests of individuals. It can be filed in the Supreme Court of India, the High Courts or the lower courts,or the lower depending on the nature and scope of the issue. PIL has become a powerful tool to ensure compliance with the legal obligations of the legislature and the executive. The primary objective of PIL is to ensure justice for all and promote human welfare. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is not defined in any law or statute. It is filed in courts under the Constitution of India to protect public rights and promote general welfare. Article 32 allows citizens to file public interest litigation in the Supreme Court of India and Article 226 allows a person who is committed to public interest to file a public interest litigation in the High Court to promote public interest. The concept of PIL has its origins in the power of judicial review in India. PILs are filed by individuals who are not victims but are interested in public welfare and social improvement . Road safety, pollution, construction hazards, terrorism,street children, atrocities against women, exploitation of casual workers, bonded labour, non-payment of minimum wages to workers, adulteration of food,disruption of ecological balance, preservation of heritage and culture, etc.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
17. From Inspiration to Exploitation: Intellectual Property Rights and Cultural Appropriation in Fashion Industry
By- A B Joshma & Vishalini C, UG Law Students, Sastra Deemed to Be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu
•Abstract
In this generation, not only do people’s ideologies change but also their tastes and preferences. This shift is most visible in the fashion industry. Fashion is a term used interchangeably to describe the creation of various products such as clothing, accessories, cosmetics etc. With changing societal attitudes, the present generation has started to adopt traditional fashion trends and cultural styles which were connected with earlier generations. Cultural appropriation is the adoption of elements - symbols, music, designs, clothing, stories, traditions etc, from a minority community by members of a dominant culture often in an exploitative or disrespectful way. Such combinations often criticise traditional values by using cultural elements without obtaining consent, providing compensation or establishing benefit - sharing mechanism to the innovators. Intellectual property law aims to protect intangible creations by granting exclusive rights to the creators but it fails to adequately protect the community-owned, ancient designs, leaving indigenous creators vulnerable to commercial exploitation. Law or legal systems were established to protect and embrace both historical and upcoming participants of all sectors. Culture often originates from or is attributed to a specific region or location. This paper seeks to critically assess how commercialisation has impacted the legal system and whether mandatory legal framework is more effective than voluntary industrial codes. This paper also evaluates the extent to which legal systems and frameworks protect and recognise indigenous people and their traditional ideas, particularly under Intellectual property (IP) laws. By analysing both positive and negative impacts of cultural shift in the fashion industry and their implications under IP laws , this paper proposes strong recommendations aimed at ensuring equality, dignity and protection to indigenous creators while safeguarding traditional cultural expressions (TCE) through a suitable legal framework , thereby contributing to a safer and equity - based commercial platform.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
18. PINK TAX AND GENDER-BASED PRICING IN FASHION PRODUCTS
By- Shivani Rajesh & Asiya Nazveen, UG Law Students, Sastra Deemed to Be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu
•Abstract
The pink tax is a term used to describe the additional charges that women face for products and services meant for them. The extra charge is applied even when the product is very similar to the other products marketed to males. Gendered pricing has become a big concern in the fashion sector, especially in terms of fashion products like clothes, shoes, bags and personal products. This abstract explores the issue of pink taxes as applied to fashion products. It explores the existence of pink taxes in fashion products, their causes and socio-economic implications. This article aims to study how the pink tax and gender pricing in fashion products affect gender equality, and also the constitutional provisions related to the same. It refers to various articles for a better understanding of the pink tax and gender pricing in fashion products. It also explores landmark judgments relating to the constitutional provisions of articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. This article explores various aspects of gender based pricing in the fashion industry and how businesses use consumer psychology to gain profits by creating an unfair practice of pink tax. It also gives suggestions for tackling the issue of pink tax and gender based pricing in fashion products so that the economic inequality faced by women regarding this can be resolved. This article is to understand the concept of pink tax and gender based pricing in fashion products and the legal provisions related to the same.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
19. Beyond the Binary: A Critical Examination of the POSH Act's Gender Exclusivity in the Post #MeToo Era
By- Manisha Pandey, LLM Candidate and Dr. Poonam Verma, Assistant Professor, School of Law, Justice & Governance, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida (U.P)
•Abstract
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 commonly known as the POSH Act - stands as a landmark piece of legislation in India's gradual and often difficult journey toward safer workplaces. But the title itself tells you something fundamental: it is a law for women. In the years since the #MeToo movement swept India in 2018, questions about who the law actually protects have grown louder and, frankly, harder to ignore. Men who face harassment at work have no statutory remedy under POSH. Transgender and non-binary employees occupy an even more uncertain legal position - the Act does not mention them at all. This paper examines the structural limitations of the POSH Act's gender-exclusive framework, traces the constitutional tensions it creates under Articles 14 and 15, and explores how the post-#MeToo landscape has both illuminated these gaps and intensified calls for legislative reform. Drawing on comparative models from the United Kingdom's Equality Act 2010, American Title VII jurisprudence developed through Oncale and Bostock, and South Africa's Employment Equity Act 1998, and building on India's own evolving constitutional jurisprudence through NALSA and Navtej Singh Johar, this paper argues that a genuinely inclusive anti-harassment law one extending protection to all workers regardless of gender is not merely desirable but constitutionally necessary.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
20. APPLICATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF PROPORTIONALITY TO REASONABLY RESTRICT FUNDAMENTAL ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN INDIA
By- Shivangi Dwivedi, LLM Candidate (Corporate Laws), National Law University, Jodhpur
•Abstract
This paper examines the evolving application of the doctrine of proportionality as a constitutional safeguard for fundamental economic rights in India, with particular emphasis on banking legislation and regulatory frameworks. Drawing from landmark Supreme Court decisions spanning seven decades, the research traces the judiciary’s gradual shift from the traditional Wednesbury standard of unreasonableness toward a more rigorous four-stage proportionality test formalized in Modern Dental College. The analysis reveals a troubling inconsistency in judicial application, wherein courts oscillate between stringent scrutiny and excessive deference depending on whether economic policy or core democratic values are at stake. Through detailed examination of three critical regulatory interventions, the Reserve Bank of India’s stressed assets circular struck down in Dharani Sugars, the Electoral Bonds Scheme invalidated for violating transparency principles, and the 2016 demonetization upheld despite significant economic disruption; this study demonstrates how proportionality as a protective function is undermined when courts selectively abandon the necessity and balancing stages in favour of rationality review. The paper argues that economic rights under Article 19(1)(g), fundamental to individual autonomy and national development, deserve constitutional protection equivalent to civil liberties. While acknowledging banking regulation, systemic importance justifies recognizing stability concerns as legitimate objectives, the research contends that courts must maintain rigorous necessity analysis and demand empirical evidence rather than accepting executive assertions uncritically. This comparative institutional analysis suggests that meaningful judicial review need not entail judicial supremacy in economic policymaking; rather, courts can scrutinize whether less restrictive alternatives exist without substituting their judgment for technical expertise. The conclusion advocates for consistent, principled application of proportionality to economic legislation; one that protects economic liberties as genuine fundamental rights while permitting necessary regulation to ensure financial stability, market fairness, and inclusive economic growth in twenty-first century India.
To have the access to full paper - CLICK HERE
21. Green Banking: On the Contemporary Conflux of Climate Action and Banks
By- Naman Bhushan Chauhan, Arnav Singh Chauhan & Rohan Pandey, UG Law Students , Symbiosis Law School, Pune
•Abstract
It is axiomatic that contemporary human development is not without cost. A prominent constituent of this cost is that which is borne by the environment. However, with the burgeoning of several primordial tenets, such as ‘intergenerational equity’ and the ‘precautionary principle’, several institutions, State-run and otherwise, have taken up the torch in combating climate change through efficacious policy. Foremost among these institutions are banks and other primary lending institutions. The relatively novel conception of ‘Green Banking’ posits that banks should not remain aloof from the causes that they finance, and therefore, where a financial undertaking involves potential environmental desecration, banks should exercise ‘environmental due diligence’ before disbursing funds forthwith. This article is thus a probe into this ‘environmental due diligence’, the liability of banks (if any) for not exercising it, and other concomitant aspects of ‘Green Banking’.
To have the access to full paper- CLICK HERE
22. Case Comment on State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335
By- Sanjana Bhandarkar & Shradha Shankar, UG Law Students, Symbiosis Law School, Pune
•Abstract
The landmark case of State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) is a cornerstone of Indian criminal law, establishing a definitive framework for quashing First Information Reports and criminal proceedings. This paper discusses three key issues regarding the Supreme Court’s ruling: Whether the allegations in the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence warranting police investigation? What are the scope and limits of the high court’s extraordinary powers as per Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023? Lastly, what are the permissible extent of judicial interference in executive-led police investigations? The paper elaborates on the seven illustrative categories prescribed by the Court where the annulment of a First Information Report is both legally and constitutionally justified. It also states that while the police are required by law to conduct an inquiry into a cognizable offense as stated in Section 173 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, this obligation does not preclude the judiciary. The Bhajan Lal case exemplifies a logical and principled compromise meant to preserve both the autonomy of the police and the balance of the criminal process. This case represented a compromise that protects investigative discretion while balancing the criminal process. The ruling in this case is still a fundamental ruling that allows Indian courts to use criminal law as a means for justice and not as a way for politics and harassment.
To have the access to full paper- CLICK HERE
23. UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IN INDIA: A STEP TOWARDS EQUALITY AND GENDER JUSTICE
•Abstract
By- Shivani Paul, UG Law Student, NIMS School of Law, NIMS University, Jaipur
The Uniform Civil Code remains one of the most debated constitutional and socio legal issues in India . Envisaged under Article 44 of the Constitution of India 2 , the UCC seeks to establish a common set of civil laws governing marriage, divorce, inheritance, succession, maintenance, and adoption irrespective of religion. The objective of the UCC is to ensure equality and justice in civil matters while preserving the secular character of the state. The existence of diverse personal laws has often led to unequal treatment among citizens and has particularly affected women in matters concerning family rights and property ownership. Several landmark judicial pronouncements have emphasized the need for reform and have repeatedly highlighted the constitutional vision behind Article 44 3 . At the same time, concerns relating to religious freedom, cultural identity and constitutional pluralism continue to make the implementation of the UCC a complex issue. The article examines the historical development of the Uniform Civil Code. Its constitutional foundations, its role in promoting gender justice and the judicial approach towards personal law reform. It further evaluates contemporary developments and challenges associated with implementation. The article argues that a gradual, inclusive, and consultative approach is essential for achieving a balance between constitutional values and India’s diverse social fabric.
To have the access to full paper- CLICK HERE
